w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2015-10-23 to 2015-10-29.
11 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read the 23 October EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2015 Minutes wiki page.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! | 9 |
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 1 |
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. | 1 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Resolutions of 23 October | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
James Green |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
|
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
11/5/15 |
Sharron Rush |
|
|
David Berman |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! |
|
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
|
summary | by responder | by choice
EO has previously reviewed and commented on early research and prototypes for the dynamic planning resource. The Planning Personas were developed to clarify audiences with an interest in planning for accessibility and capture their needs.
Please read this document and consider whether there are any missing personas, if any personas do not make sense, and whether the needs are realistic.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have no further suggestions. | 9 |
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have commented below. | |
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Planning: Personas | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
|
James Green |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
Eric Eggert |
|
I did skim the personas and they look good to me. |
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
David Berman |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have no further suggestions. |
|
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have commented below. | |
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it. |
|
summary | by responder | by choice
The Planning prototype is a draft of the Planning Roadmap. The prototype has the top level for all sections and the whole of the Initiate section developed.
Please explore this resource and add any comments below per the instructions in Work for This Week
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have no further suggestions. | 6 |
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have commented below. | 3 |
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Planning: Prototype | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
I understand the structure and goals of the planning/roadmap tool. I think that I understand it well because of being heavily involved with the editing of topics, card sorting activities, brainstorming of the structure and layout of the tool. If this was new to me it might be a bit confusing for a while until I got the hang of how it is organized and could/should be used. I think to help, there should be a little more emphasis on the Overview page describing the organization structure and how to use it. Even the use of headings like "How this Tool is Organized" or "How to Use this Tool." I'm good with moving forward with current approach knowing that redesign similar to Tips resource is on the way. |
James Green |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
I've been discussing directly with Kevin. |
Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
Eric Eggert |
|
|
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
When do we think we will have a final name for the resource? I strongly support the idea of introducing icons and organizational structure similar to Getting Started. Or even better, can we use layout in sync with new Developer resources from W3C? https://www.w3.org/developers/#get-started |
David Berman |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have no further suggestions. |
|
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have commented below. |
|
I will review it by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now. |
|
summary | by responder | by choice
Consider the suggestion to add View Source Code options to more of the Tips Examples. The full list is presented in Work for this Week. If you have comments or suggestions, please add them to the GitHub Issue.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I support the suggestion and have no comments to add. | 6 |
I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub. | 2 |
I do not support this suggestion. I have added my comments to GitHub. | 1 |
I will comment on this topic by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Tips: Add view source code to more examples | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
I support it in a qualified way. Being a developer, I don't have a good read on how viewing source is for non-developers. So the more code on the developing page, the better. Beyond that, I defer to others more in touch with other audiences. |
Brent Bakken |
|
|
James Green |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
[Document author] |
Eric Eggert |
|
I think it is good to have the view full source code in the developing examples. I see no value to show code to writers and designers. |
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
+1 to Eric's comment to *not* add code to Writing and Designing but only to the Developing Tips |
David Berman |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I support the suggestion and have no comments to add. |
|
I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub. |
|
I do not support this suggestion. I have added my comments to GitHub. |
|
I will comment on this topic by the date in the comment section below. | |
I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group. |
|
summary | by responder | by choice
What is your opinion of the link text and heading "Hidden Success Criteria" for the section that displays the SCs that have been filtered out by the specific choice of filters and/or tags?
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I am OK with the link text as is. | 2 |
I think it could be improved by have no suggestions. | 1 |
I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below. | 5 |
I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Hidden Success Criteria | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
|
Brent Bakken |
|
I like the idea of calling them "Unrelated Success Criteria" - But I am concerned that if that is used, then they would maybe not know that they are hidden/filtered out. |
James Green |
|
Show Filtered Items |
Shawn Lawton Henry | Sorry I couldn't get to it this week. | |
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
Other Success Criteria |
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
• Filtered success criteria • Filtered out success criteria • View all other success criteria • View all others |
Eric Eggert |
|
Filtered-out Success Criteria<br>The following success critera are not shown based on the selected tags and/or filters. [Editor] |
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
|
David Berman |
|
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I am OK with the link text as is. |
|
I think it could be improved by have no suggestions. |
|
I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below. |
|
I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group. |
|
summary | by responder | by choice
Consider the discussion of activities tagging for the QuickRef. If you have ideas about the taxonomy, please post the to wai-eo-editors@w3.org and tell us about it below.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list. | 2 |
I may have some thoughts in the future but not now. | 8 |
I will pass on commenting on this. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
Responder | Tags taxonomy for QuickRef | Comments |
---|---|---|
Anna Belle Leiserson |
|
I am happy to help work on this starting next week. |
Brent Bakken |
|
|
James Green |
|
|
Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
Kevin White |
|
I submitted my thoughts in the <a href="https://github.com/w3c/wai-wcag-quickref/issues/28#issuecomment-146147991">comment in issue #28</a>. |
Eric Eggert |
|
[Editor collecting opinions] |
Howard Kramer |
|
|
Sharron Rush |
|
I am working on this with James and AnnaBelle and we hope to have preliminary suggestions next week. |
David Berman |
|
My thoughts are already in the http://www.w3.org/2015/10/16-eo-minutes.html#item04 . |
Choice | Responders |
---|---|
I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list. |
|
I may have some thoughts in the future but not now. |
|
I will pass on commenting on this. |
|
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.