W3C

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - Due 28 Oct

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2015-10-23 to 2015-10-29.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 23 October
  2. Planning: Personas
  3. Planning: Prototype
  4. Tips: Add view source code to more examples
  5. Hidden Success Criteria
  6. Tags taxonomy for QuickRef

1. Resolutions of 23 October

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 23 October EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2015 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! 9
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 1
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolutions of 23 OctoberComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Kevin White
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Howard Kramer
  • I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
11/5/15
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
David Berman
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • David Berman
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
  • Howard Kramer

2. Planning: Personas

summary | by responder | by choice

EO has previously reviewed and commented on early research and prototypes for the dynamic planning resource. The Planning Personas were developed to clarify audiences with an interest in planning for accessibility and capture their needs.

Please read this document and consider whether there are any missing personas, if any personas do not make sense, and whether the needs are realistic.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have no further suggestions. 9
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have commented below.
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Planning: PersonasComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
Brent Bakken
James Green
Shawn Lawton Henry
Vicki Menezes Miller
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Kevin White [Document author]
Eric Eggert
  • I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it.
I did skim the personas and they look good to me.
Howard Kramer
  • I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it.
Sharron Rush
David Berman

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have no further suggestions.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • Sharron Rush
  • David Berman
I have reviewed the Planning Personas and have commented below.
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Howard Kramer

3. Planning: Prototype

summary | by responder | by choice

The Planning prototype is a draft of the Planning Roadmap. The prototype has the top level for all sections and the whole of the Initiate section developed.

Please explore this resource and add any comments below per the instructions in Work for This Week

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have no further suggestions. 6
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have commented below. 3
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Planning: PrototypeComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
Brent Bakken I understand the structure and goals of the planning/roadmap tool. I think that I understand it well because of being heavily involved with the editing of topics, card sorting activities, brainstorming of the structure and layout of the tool. If this was new to me it might be a bit confusing for a while until I got the hang of how it is organized and could/should be used. I think to help, there should be a little more emphasis on the Overview page describing the organization structure and how to use it. Even the use of headings like "How this Tool is Organized" or "How to Use this Tool."

I'm good with moving forward with current approach knowing that redesign similar to Tips resource is on the way.
James Green
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now.
Vicki Menezes Miller
Shadi Abou-Zahra I've been discussing directly with Kevin.
Kevin White [Document author]
Eric Eggert
Howard Kramer
  • I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now.
Sharron Rush When do we think we will have a final name for the resource? I strongly support the idea of introducing icons and organizational structure similar to Getting Started. Or even better, can we use layout in sync with new Developer resources from W3C? https://www.w3.org/developers/#get-started
David Berman

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have no further suggestions.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • James Green
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Kevin White
  • Eric Eggert
  • David Berman
I have reviewed the Planning prototype and have commented below.
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Sharron Rush
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it for now.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer

4. Tips: Add view source code to more examples

summary | by responder | by choice

Consider the suggestion to add View Source Code options to more of the Tips Examples. The full list is presented in Work for this Week. If you have comments or suggestions, please add them to the GitHub Issue.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I support the suggestion and have no comments to add. 6
I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub. 2
I do not support this suggestion. I have added my comments to GitHub. 1
I will comment on this topic by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tips: Add view source code to more examplesComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
I support it in a qualified way. Being a developer, I don't have a good read on how viewing source is for non-developers. So the more code on the developing page, the better. Beyond that, I defer to others more in touch with other audiences.
Brent Bakken
  • I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub.
James Green
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
Kevin White
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
[Document author]
Eric Eggert
  • I do not support this suggestion. I have added my comments to GitHub.
I think it is good to have the view full source code in the developing examples. I see no value to show code to writers and designers.
Howard Kramer
  • I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group.
Sharron Rush
  • I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub.
+1 to Eric's comment to *not* add code to Writing and Designing but only to the Developing Tips
David Berman
  • I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I support the suggestion and have no comments to add.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • James Green
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Kevin White
  • David Berman
I support the suggestion but have added comments to GitHub.
  • Brent Bakken
  • Sharron Rush
I do not support this suggestion. I have added my comments to GitHub.
  • Eric Eggert
I will comment on this topic by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to this; I will pass on commenting on it, and go with the decision of the Group.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Howard Kramer

5. Hidden Success Criteria

summary | by responder | by choice

What is your opinion of the link text and heading "Hidden Success Criteria" for the section that displays the SCs that have been filtered out by the specific choice of filters and/or tags?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I am OK with the link text as is. 2
I think it could be improved by have no suggestions. 1
I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below. 5
I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Hidden Success CriteriaComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group.
Brent Bakken
  • I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
I like the idea of calling them "Unrelated Success Criteria" - But I am concerned that if that is used, then they would maybe not know that they are hidden/filtered out.
James Green
  • I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
Show Filtered Items
Shawn Lawton Henry Sorry I couldn't get to it this week.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
Other Success Criteria
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I am OK with the link text as is.
Kevin White
  • I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
• Filtered success criteria
• Filtered out success criteria
• View all other success criteria
• View all others
Eric Eggert
  • I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
Filtered-out Success Criteria<br>The following success critera are not shown based on the selected tags and/or filters.

[Editor]
Howard Kramer
  • I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group.
Sharron Rush
  • I think it could be improved by have no suggestions.
David Berman
  • I am OK with the link text as is.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I am OK with the link text as is.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • David Berman
I think it could be improved by have no suggestions.
  • Sharron Rush
I have a suggestion for link text improvement and have put it in the comment box below.
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Kevin White
  • Eric Eggert
I am unable to review this a timely manner and will go with the decision of the group.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • Howard Kramer

6. Tags taxonomy for QuickRef

summary | by responder | by choice

Consider the discussion of activities tagging for the QuickRef. If you have ideas about the taxonomy, please post the to wai-eo-editors@w3.org and tell us about it below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list. 2
I may have some thoughts in the future but not now. 8
I will pass on commenting on this. 2

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Tags taxonomy for QuickRefComments
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
I am happy to help work on this starting next week.
Brent Bakken
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
James Green
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
Kevin White
  • I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list.
I submitted my thoughts in the <a href="https://github.com/w3c/wai-wcag-quickref/issues/28#issuecomment-146147991">comment in issue #28</a>.
Eric Eggert
  • I will pass on commenting on this.
[Editor collecting opinions]
Howard Kramer
  • I will pass on commenting on this.
Sharron Rush
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
I am working on this with James and AnnaBelle and we hope to have preliminary suggestions next week.
David Berman
  • I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list.
  • I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
My thoughts are already in the http://www.w3.org/2015/10/16-eo-minutes.html#item04 .

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I am very interested and have submitted my thoughts to the editor's list.
  • Kevin White
  • David Berman
I may have some thoughts in the future but not now.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Sharron Rush
  • David Berman
I will pass on commenting on this.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Howard Kramer

More details on responses

  • Anna Belle Leiserson: last responded on 28, October 2015 at 20:47 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 28, October 2015 at 21:54 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 02:14 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 02:31 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 05:43 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 07:24 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 11:09 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 12:05 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 15:11 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 15:46 (UTC)
  • David Berman: last responded on 29, October 2015 at 23:54 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Reinaldo Ferraz
  9. Bill Kasdorf
  10. Cristina Mussinelli
  11. Kevin Rydberg
  12. Adina Halter
  13. Denis Boudreau
  14. Laura Keen
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Eric M. Velleman
  31. Billie Johnston
  32. Michele Williams
  33. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  34. Michel Hansma
  35. Brian Elton
  36. Vera Lange
  37. Jasper Jeurens
  38. Julianna Rowsell
  39. Tabitha Mahoney
  40. Fred Edora
  41. Rabab Gomaa
  42. Marcelo Paiva
  43. Leonard Beasley
  44. Frankie Wolf
  45. Supriya Makude
  46. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  47. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire