w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 06 April 2018
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2018-04-06 to 2018-04-17.
6 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference
- Understanding WCAG 2,1 Documents - Editorial Contributor
- Other Information to Share
1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2018 Minutes wiki page.
If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. | 3 |
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 1 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. | 2 |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
Re: Ra11y Matrix I don’t feel strongly about the “A11y” part of the word, but I wonder if 'Ra11y' does a good job of representing the resource. Even if I know the a11y abbreviation, it is unclear what a Raccessibility Matrix would feature. I think we could be much simpler and just call it something like “Accessibility Roles Matrix” with an A11Y-Roles abbreviation. Just food for thought. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
Re: "Ra11y Matrix" While "a11y" is a common abbreviation *within* the field, it is very jargony and thus exclusive-cluby. Also, in many fonts, one cannot distinguish between a-one-one-y and a-l-l-y ; that is, the number 1 or the lowercase letter L. Also, "a11y" is hard for some people to process, including some people with certain cognitive disabilities. (This lack of clarity is even more pronounced in "Ra11y" because it is like the word "rally".) For these and other reasons, I think we do not want to use "a11y" in the name of a significant project, especially one intended for people who aren't accessibility insiders. Less importantly, I think "Ra11y Matrix" doesn't communicate what it is. Maybe I'm missing something, but "Matrix" doesn't mean anything to me. I think it needs "Roles" in there. <joke>maybe Accessibility Roles and Responsibilities Guidance (ARRG)</joke> I think it would be good to have a brainstorming session about this when people are up for it. (maybe "over drinks" in Austin in May?) Usually when EOWG takes a little time to work together, we come up with a solution that really "sings" and fits well. Note that the descriptions for the roles themselves might end up being very useful throughout W3C work, such as for "Silver" (next gen accessibility guidelines) -- so it'd be good to have a project title that's not limiting. /me re-reads the minutes... I see "just a working title for now and can finalize as project develops". I'd like to share my thoughts, yet am OK with Ra11y Matrix as a working title if others want to stick with that. I do hope we revisit before Ra11y Matrix gets ingrained. ------- Re: "We are in beta release now and by the week of the 16th we will do the full release (as currently planned and understood.) Then will need to do outreach." Correction: We hope to have a revised/updated beta the week of 16 April. We hope to replace the existing site later in April -- although we might go into May to give people more time to get used to the new design in the beta. ------- Re: "Laura: I was curious why we have not announced the beta version. Did we decide we did not want to get that wide feedback?" We announced it on 15 March: * WAI IG e-mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2018JanMar/0275.html * EOWG e-mail: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2018JanMar/0053.html * Tweet: https://twitter.com/w3c_wai/status/974351936358158336 After we address known issues, we plan to do more announcements and promotion of the beta. Per above, that might be late the week of 16 April. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. |
|
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
2. Understanding WCAG 2,1 Documents - Editorial Contributor
summary | by responder | by choice
Over the next few months a small team of EOWG participants will be focusing work on providing editorial contributions for the Understanding Documents for new 2.1 Success Criteria. This team will be working on a weekly basis reading draft content and providing editorial recommendations to the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group. Work will begin shortly.
Read meeting minutes on this topic for more detail concerning the time and effort of this work.
If interested, we invite you to join this important focused work over the next few months.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I would like to commit my time to this project. Please include me when we get started. | 2 |
| I might be interested. I would like more detailed information of time and effort. | 1 |
| I am not interested, or don't have the time to be an editor of the Understanding WCAG 2.1 Documents. | 3 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Understanding WCAG 2,1 Documents - Editorial Contributor | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
It all depends on the time required. I have an intense project between now and end May. |
| Eric Eggert |
|
No time. Totally interested, but no time. *sadface* |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I would like to commit my time to this project. Please include me when we get started. |
|
| I might be interested. I would like more detailed information of time and effort. |
|
| I am not interested, or don't have the time to be an editor of the Understanding WCAG 2.1 Documents. |
|
3. Other Information to Share
Feel free to put here things such as:
- What you worked on for EOWG this week.
- What you would like EOWG folks to know.
- Information or questions for EOWG planning — for upcoming teleconferences, future work planning, etc.
(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)
Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)
Details
| Responder | Other Information to Share |
|---|---|
| Brent Bakken | |
| Laura Keen | |
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | |
| Eric Eggert | Working on the redesign over the next few days. Hope to launch it soon! |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
More details on responses
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 6, April 2018 at 22:11 (UTC)
- Laura Keen: last responded on 9, April 2018 at 13:30 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 12, April 2018 at 06:53 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 17, April 2018 at 18:17 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 18, April 2018 at 08:48 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 18, April 2018 at 21:14 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Shadi Abou-Zahra
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Sharron Rush
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Adina Halter
- Denis Boudreau
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Daniel Montalvo
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project