W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 27 July 2018

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2018-07-30 to 2018-08-01.

12 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference
  2. Work in progress review of the Business Case
  3. Current projects you are reviewing, working on
  4. EOWG Teleconference Availability

1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is posted.

If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. 8
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 4
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Minutes and Resolutions from TeleconferenceComments
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Amanda Mace
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Lewis Phillips
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Norah Sinclair
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
  • Sharron Rush
  • Eric Eggert
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Brent Bakken
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Amanda Mace
  • Stéphane Deschamps
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Work in progress review of the Business Case

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the current iteration of the Business Case for Accessibility and comment on it with considerations of Level #2 of review Stages.

Please consider if this is the right approach; if the case studies are coherent and convincing; if anything is jarring or inconsistent; if there are arguments or evidence that is missing; and any other observations to revise and take this draft to the next stage.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time. 8
I have read the current version and have entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below. 1
I have read the current version and have entered my comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below.
I did not read the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below. 1
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Work in progress review of the Business CaseComments
Sharron Rush
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Amanda Mace
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Eric Eggert
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
 No comments because I likely don’t have time while this survey is running. I really like the direction. I am happy to provide some thoughts on how European countries handle accessibility to make the legal section a bit more diverse. I really like how the article draws you in and then has a nice flow from section to section. It is an article that I’d _want_ to read while with other resources I sometimes have to make me read them. It is humane, clearly written and not overly complicated. If we need to add more information, we should consider adding specialized short articles in the same style. Maybe at some point sections of this page get spun up into their own articles, too (with a summary here).
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group.
Lewis Phillips
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Vicki Menezes Miller Strong: I would remove the heading "What is a business case" and the first paragraph which follows.

Rationale:
- If the intended audience is senior executives, high level management or leaders (each one of these have been mentioned somewhere as part of the intended audience), then, they would know what a business case is. I feel the paragraph is superfluous.

- The audience as mentioned above usually doesn't have the luxury of time. Therefore, taking out what might/should already be known to them, would bring the resource more to the point. If they really don't know what a business case is, then, they can easily google it.

Suggestion: Compared with the "bullet" version, some of the current headings in the "story" version could be improved:
e.g. "Innovation" becomes more informative and catchy with "Drive Innovation"
"Brand Enhancement" > "Impact Brand Reputation"
"Minimise Legal Risk" > "Minimise Financial and Legal Risk" (Decision makers like to know where the cost reduction is)

What I'm missing in this resource (again for decision makers it is interesting), is the part in the "bullet version" called "Decrease Expenses" and "Impact Customer Satisfaction". These are key words for the intended audience.

I still feel that that it's a pity we cannot include the examples given in the "bullet" version. I realize it is not easy to satisfy everyone, but it seems to me a pity to miss out on those pointers.

I feel the resource could be shorter for the intended audience - again, just my view.


Kris Anne Kinney
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Laura Keen
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Norah Sinclair
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Andrew Arch
Brent Bakken
  • I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I did not read the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below.
 I have read the Business Case and expect to add my comments by Wednesday 8 August.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have read the current version and progress seems good, I have no comment at this time.
  • Sharron Rush
  • Amanda Mace
  • Eric Eggert
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Brent Bakken
I have read the current version and have entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below.
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
I have read the current version and have entered my comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below.
I did not read the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group.
  • Stéphane Deschamps

3. Current projects you are reviewing, working on

summary | by responder | by choice

There are several concurrent projects in development and review at EOWG at this time. We understand that your weekly commitment of four hours does not allow you to fully participate in all of them. Please indicate which projects have your current attention.Use the comment filed to add suggestions for improving how we work - and remember this is a public survey, your responses are seen by all.

To add to an EOWG meeting agenda: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Accessibility Statements 2
Business Case for Web Accessibility 5
Understanding WCAG 2.1 Documents 4
Roles and Responsibilities Matrix
Other described below 1
Attended meeting, but unable to spend additional time.
Unable to spend time this week on EO projects.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Current projects you are reviewing, working onComments
Sharron Rush
Amanda Mace
Eric Eggert Website
Stéphane Deschamps
  • Other described below
 Translation of “How People with Disabilities Use the Web” into French, this will probably end mid-September.
Lewis Phillips
Vicki Menezes Miller
Kris Anne Kinney
Laura Keen
Norah Sinclair
Andrew Arch
Brent Bakken
Shawn Lawton Henry

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
Accessibility Statements
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
Business Case for Web Accessibility
  • Sharron Rush
  • Eric Eggert
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Laura Keen
  • Brent Bakken
Understanding WCAG 2.1 Documents
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Brent Bakken
Roles and Responsibilities Matrix
Other described below
  • Stéphane Deschamps
Attended meeting, but unable to spend additional time.
Unable to spend time this week on EO projects.

4. EOWG Teleconference Availability

Have you updated your EOWG Teleconference Availability lately? (If not, please do so now. Thank you!)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 12
no

Details

Responder EOWG Teleconference Availability
Sharron Rush yes
Amanda Mace yes
Eric Eggert yes
Stéphane Deschamps yes
Lewis Phillips yes
Vicki Menezes Miller yes
Kris Anne Kinney yes
Laura Keen yes
Norah Sinclair yes
Andrew Arch yes
Brent Bakken yes
Shawn Lawton Henry yes

More details on responses

  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 30, July 2018 at 16:08 (UTC)
  • Amanda Mace: last responded on 31, July 2018 at 05:47 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 31, July 2018 at 08:55 (UTC)
  • Stéphane Deschamps: last responded on 31, July 2018 at 10:30 (UTC)
  • Lewis Phillips: last responded on 31, July 2018 at 16:15 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 12:02 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 17:47 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 19:30 (UTC)
  • Norah Sinclair: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 20:28 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 22:16 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 1, August 2018 at 22:22 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 3, August 2018 at 21:21 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Reinaldo Ferraz
  9. Bill Kasdorf
  10. Cristina Mussinelli
  11. Kevin White
  12. Kevin Rydberg
  13. Adina Halter
  14. Denis Boudreau
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.