W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 05 April 2019

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2019-04-05 to 2019-04-10.

12 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference
  2. Minor update to Perspective video text
  3. Easy Checks Bookmarklets
  4. Easy Checks tools suggestions
  5. Other Information to Share
  6. EOWG Teleconference Availability

1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2019 Minutes wiki page.

If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. 10
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 2
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Minutes and Resolutions from TeleconferenceComments
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Denis Boudreau
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Lewis Phillips
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Chris O'Brien
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Denis Boudreau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Chris O'Brien
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Stéphane Deschamps
  • Lewis Phillips
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Minor update to Perspective video text

summary | by responder | by choice

The resource editor and EOWG chairs approved minor changes and typo fixes to text on a Perspectives video page. You can view the changes in GitHub. Please indicate your understanding and acceptance of the changes.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I understand and accept the changes. 12
I disagree with the changes and explained why below.
I have no opinion and pass on commenting.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Minor update to Perspective video textComments
Eric Eggert
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Denis Boudreau
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Laura Keen
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Lewis Phillips
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Chris O'Brien
  • I understand and accept the changes.
Brent Bakken
  • I understand and accept the changes.
 Reviewed in GitHub
Howard Kramer
  • I understand and accept the changes.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I understand and accept the changes.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Denis Boudreau
  • Laura Keen
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Stéphane Deschamps
  • Daniel Montalvo
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Chris O'Brien
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
I disagree with the changes and explained why below.
I have no opinion and pass on commenting.

3. Easy Checks Bookmarklets

summary | by responder | by choice

At Friday's meeting, EOWG discussed a proposal to directly include accessibility checking bookmarklets directly in the revised Easy Checks. Please review the Easy Checks section of the minutes and comment below.

As well, if you have additional suggestions for another approach, please include those in the space provided. Thanks.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks. 4
I am leaning toward including Easy Checks bookmarklets but have reservations explained below. 3
I am slightly disinclined to include Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons. 2
I strongly oppose the inclusion of Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons.
I have no opinion about this, so I will pass and accept the decisions of the Group. 2
I need more time to think about it and will register my thoughts by the date entered below. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Easy Checks BookmarkletsComments
Eric Eggert
  • I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks.
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I have no opinion about this, so I will pass and accept the decisions of the Group.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I am leaning toward including Easy Checks bookmarklets but have reservations explained below.
 It sounds like:
* lots of positives to providing bookmarklets
* some people still might not be able to use the bookmarklets

I'm leaning towards providing bookmarklets as one option (probably presenting it as the suggested option), leaving other options, and adding simple filters so people can get the instructions that apply to them and the other options are not cluttering it (especially for IE WAT - which seems to make it seem outdated to some readers, yet is important for a small number of users).
Denis Boudreau
  • I am slightly disinclined to include Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons.
 I am in favour of creating tools that automate easy checks, but am worried with the perceived security concerns raised by bookmarklets. I would vote for the development of browser extensions instead, that would do a similar thing.
Laura Keen
  • I am leaning toward including Easy Checks bookmarklets but have reservations explained below.
 My only concern would be providing a resource that could potentially be unavailable for people/organizations who block them due to security restraints. Having said that I'm currently on the Library of Congress' network and Paul Adam's bookmarklets http://pauljadam.com/bookmarklets/ are working for me. So I'm not sure how much of an issue it could be - just adding that they are working on the LOC internal network.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I need more time to think about it and will register my thoughts by the date entered below.
15.04.2019
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I have no opinion about this, so I will pass and accept the decisions of the Group.
Daniel Montalvo
  • I am slightly disinclined to include Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons.
 Some people in last Friday's meeting mentioned the fact that if we finally support bookmarklets we might have a significant impact on the audience that we are addressing since most of them might be prevented to use such bookmarklets due to the seccurity constrains within their organization. I very much agree on this view.
Lewis Phillips
  • I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks.
Chris O'Brien
  • I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks.
 I appreciate Denis' feedback regarding security and bookmarklets - I feel that we can ease the minds of people by verify these resources.
Brent Bakken
  • I am leaning toward including Easy Checks bookmarklets but have reservations explained below.
 If some cannot download bookmarklets because of company security policies, it should not stop us from developing and providing them for those who can.
Howard Kramer
  • I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I am in favor of the proposal to implement bookmarklets in Easy Checks.
  • Eric Eggert
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Chris O'Brien
  • Howard Kramer
I am leaning toward including Easy Checks bookmarklets but have reservations explained below.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Laura Keen
  • Brent Bakken
I am slightly disinclined to include Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons.
  • Denis Boudreau
  • Daniel Montalvo
I strongly oppose the inclusion of Easy Checks bookmarklets for the following reasons.
I have no opinion about this, so I will pass and accept the decisions of the Group.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Stéphane Deschamps
I need more time to think about it and will register my thoughts by the date entered below.
  • Vicki Menezes Miller

4. Easy Checks tools suggestions

During the meeting, some people mentioned additional tools that we might explore. If you have suggestions, please list them below or add to the Easy Checks suggested tools list

Details

Responder Easy Checks tools suggestions
Eric Eggert
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Shawn Lawton Henry I added new "Accessibility Insights" -- although I haven't looked at it enough yet to see if it is a good tool for Easy Checks and if so how we would integrate instructions for it...
Denis Boudreau I think just beginning with the elements covered in Easy Checks would be a great enough start. We can always come back to other ideas later.
Laura Keen
Vicki Menezes Miller
Stéphane Deschamps
Daniel Montalvo This would possibly lead to further work and writing on easy Checks but I do think there might be the possibility to add I pretty much agree with what was said, I personally relied very much on the Wave extension when I needed to perform audits.
Lewis Phillips
Chris O'Brien
Brent Bakken None at this time, but if I come across some in the future I will add them as ideas.
Howard Kramer

5. Other Information to Share

Feel free to put here things such as:

  • What you worked on for EOWG this week.
  • What you would like EOWG folks to know.
  • Information or questions for EOWG planning — for upcoming teleconferences, future work planning, etc.

(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)

Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)

Details

Responder Other Information to Share
Eric Eggert
Shadi Abou-Zahra
Shawn Lawton Henry
Denis Boudreau Here's a bit of an ARRM update, as it was sent to Brent by email yesterday.

Following the face to face, we gave a shot at revisiting the decision tree, and we've completely flipped it on its head, for the better: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Role-Based_Decision_Tree. It's now a 7-step process, that we feel is much more robust.

We've also looped in Lewis, who has since joined us on the core team. We've been reviewing more task points together, and added a new content type to our list (css presentations): https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Accessibility_Checkpoint_Master_List#CSS_Presentation. We're in the process or finalizing our common appreciation of the distribution, and we're making good steady progress.

Finally, I've updated the project page, so that our deliverables better reflect what we've accomplished in 2018, and what we've been up to in 2019 so far: https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/ARRM_Project_-_Accessibility_Roles_and_Responsibilities_Mapping#Time_Line_.28Revised_as_of_2019.2F03.2F21.29.

That's what comes to mind for now. We are meeting again this coming Thursday, so more progress to come.., :)
Laura Keen
Vicki Menezes Miller
Stéphane Deschamps Reviewed translation proofreadings on Github.
(not much before that, also active when needed on ARRM)
Daniel Montalvo Currently working on a unit that plans to be called "Stories of people with disabilities" for the module "People andd access technologies" for the Wai-Curricula project. Also doing extensive readings of all the EOWG/WAI available materials.
Lewis Phillips
Chris O'Brien
Brent Bakken Continued UnDocs Work
Howard Kramer

6. EOWG Teleconference Availability

Have you updated your EOWG Teleconference Availability lately? (If not, please do so now. Thank you!)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 10
no 1

Details

Responder EOWG Teleconference Availability
Eric Eggert yes
Shadi Abou-Zahra yes
Shawn Lawton Henry
Denis Boudreau yes
Laura Keen yes
Vicki Menezes Miller yes
Stéphane Deschamps yes
Daniel Montalvo no
Lewis Phillips yes
Chris O'Brien yes
Brent Bakken yes
Howard Kramer yes

More details on responses

  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 7, April 2019 at 07:10 (UTC)
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 9, April 2019 at 19:51 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 12:41 (UTC)
  • Denis Boudreau: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 13:04 (UTC)
  • Laura Keen: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 13:20 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 13:38 (UTC)
  • Stéphane Deschamps: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 14:30 (UTC)
  • Daniel Montalvo: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 14:50 (UTC)
  • Lewis Phillips: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 14:51 (UTC)
  • Chris O'Brien: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 16:13 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 10, April 2019 at 19:51 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 11, April 2019 at 04:16 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Sharron Rush
  6. Jedi Lin
  7. David Sloan
  8. Mary Jo Mueller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin White
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Adina Halter
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Mark Palmer
  24. Jade Matos Carew
  25. Sonsoles López Pernas
  26. Greta Krafsig
  27. Jason McKee
  28. Jayne Schurick
  29. Billie Johnston
  30. Michele Williams
  31. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  32. Brian Elton
  33. Julianna Rowsell
  34. Tabitha Mahoney
  35. Fred Edora
  36. Rabab Gomaa
  37. Marcelo Paiva
  38. Eloisa Guerrero
  39. Leonard Beasley
  40. Frankie Wolf
  41. Supriya Makude
  42. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  43. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.