w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2015-09-07 to 2015-10-01.
3 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
Please review the following GitHub issue response: Issue 110.
The link above references the specific comment containing the proposal, but feel free to review the discussion within the issue page.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Accept as proposed | 2 |
Accept with the following changes | 1 |
Do not accept at this time |
Responder | Issue 110: Update G65 breadcrumb technique to follow the HTML5 pattern? | |
---|---|---|
Laura Carlson | Accept as proposed | |
Jonathan Avila | Accept with the following changes | Recommend code indentiom in example for readability |
Bruce Bailey | Accept as proposed |
Please review the following GitHub issue response: Issue 114.
The link above references the specific comment containing the proposal, but feel free to review the discussion within the issue page.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Accept as proposed | 3 |
Accept with the following changes | |
Do not accept at this time |
Responder | Issue 114: Example #2 of F22 seems to stretch SC 3.2.5 requirement | |
---|---|---|
Laura Carlson | Accept as proposed | |
Jonathan Avila | Accept as proposed | |
Bruce Bailey | Accept as proposed |
Please review the following GitHub issue response to Issue 99.
The response is found in the pull request for the new technique.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Accept as proposed | 1 |
Accept with the following changes | 2 |
Do not accept at this time |
Responder | Issue 99: Update PDF14 to be in sync with PDF/UA and also ensure footer information is available in other means | |
---|---|---|
Laura Carlson | Accept as proposed | |
Jonathan Avila | Accept with the following changes | I generally agree but this does not take into account footers/headers that have links. Links cannot be artifacts. |
Bruce Bailey | Accept with the following changes | I think the final check is hard to parse. If A and B then FAIL==TRUE so FALSE -- but B is written in the negative. So I think it might be easier to parse if B is written in the affirmative: Check on whether the information in the headers and/or footers is available in text or in some other programmatic way in the document. (e.g., on title page, in prose in the main body, PDF pages match header/footer page numbers etc.) If Check 1 is TRUE and Check 2 is FALSE, then this failure condition applies and the content fails the Success Criterion. |
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.