This is a text version of the public questionnaire:

  "Determining which Community and Business Groups should transition to
Working Group"

We recommend that you only use this review form if you are unable
to use the online questionnaire, which is available at:

    https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/CG2WG/
If you choose to send in this questionnaire form instead of using the
online questionnaire, please mail the completed form to
team-community-process@w3.org by 15 May 2013 at 23:59 Boston Time.

The online questionnaire helps the W3C Team reduce errors and to
compute results automatically. If you believe there is a technical
reason why you are unable to use the online questionnaire, please send
the relevant information to w3t-sys@w3.org, but in the meantime we welcome
your email response to this form.

Thank you.

=====================
Questionnaire starts

I, 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Your Community Group or Business Group
> 
> ----
> Please, name the Community Group or Business Group for which you are
> submitting answers.
> 
> 
Name of your Community Group or Business Group: 


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> State of your Community Group or Business Group
> 
> ----
> Is your Community Group or Business Group:
> 
> 


 * ( ) Active and ongoing and nearing completion
 * ( ) Inactive because it has completed its work
 * ( ) Active and ongoing and far from completion
 * ( ) Inactive because the original scope is no longer relevant or because
the CG never got momentum


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Goal of your Community Group or Business Group
> 
> ----
> Is the goal of your Community Group or Business Group:
> 
> 


 * ( ) To provide a specification
 * ( ) To be a discussion forum for specifications done elsewhere
 * ( ) Other (please specify)

You checked "other", please specify: 



> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Status of the spec of your Community Group or Business Group
> 
> ----
> What are your specification transition plans?
> 


 * ( ) We have already handed off all or part of a specification to a
Working Group.

 * ( ) We plan to request that a specification transition to a Working
Group within six months.

 * ( ) We have a specification that is a candidate for transition to a
Working Group but have no schedule yet for doing so.
 * ( ) We do not plan to transition a specification to a Working Group
(provide details in the next question).


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> No transition to a Working Group
> 
> ----
> We do not expect to transition to a Working Group for the following
> reasons (check all that apply):
> 
> 


 * [ ] Too early, insufficient number of implementations yet.
 * [ ] Too narrow, not a key part of the Open Web Platform.
 * [ ] A Community Group or Business Group is good enough, Working Groups
have too much bureaucracy.
 * [ ] We suspect that key players will not want to make Working Group
patent commitments.
 * [ ] Too many key players are not Members of W3C and would not want to
follow the work into a Working Group.
 * [ ] Other (please specify).

You checked "other", please specify: 



> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Open comments
> 
> ----
> Please, let us us know of anything you feel is relevant to complete your
> answers.
> 
> 
Comments: 



> 
> 
> These answers were last modified on 
> by 
>