contents: open threads, closed threads.
SKW to draft proposal to address ""information resource"
note Roy's action re text from Sandro
related to information resource, will leave pending. Note Roy's action.
DanC to reply to djw re "take on meaning": yes, agree with your comment, think that's what webarch says. let us know if you think of something better
SKW: This is a request to PatH. DanC: I gather he intends to do it.
DanC to respond ala "we didn't say assing and didn't mean it. does that clarify?"
PaulC: explain to a.p.meyer that we didn't mean any more than we said.
NDW: after integrating comments on URI ownership section, ask KD if it satisfies KD 005
NDW: deal with KD-001 as editorial and let Karl know
NDW: seek clarification on KD 002
NDW: seek clarification on KD 004
NDW: to cite "Common HTTP Implementation Problems" http://www.w3.org/TR/chips per KD 003
RoyF: respond to "non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers" comment
NDW: respond to "Should TR/webarch be TR/webarch10?" comment
note SKW's action above
Roy to digest Sandro's proposal and explain why it is unacceptable to him
DanC: propose some response to " AWWW, 20040816 release, sections 1 and 2" comment
NDW: integrate text on uri ownership, salting to taste
PaulC to close "# DIWG Review of Last Call WD Architecture of the World Wide Web
Chris to draft text in response to "too positive on extensibility"
Stuart to lead another round of discussion on Larry's comment