Current list of action items -- All: discuss when/how/why use Schema to help resolution of issue #17 -- Asir to summarise "sparse arrays" email thread to identify any new issues, by next telcon -- All: review Jacek's proposed resolution for issue #144 [4] (in time for next telcon) -- David to start prioritising ETF issues -- David to offline contact DanB/BarbaraP to request concrete demonstrations to evidence lack of suitability -- jacek write up up proposal for resolving 18 -- jacek put the other 3 issues on list which were spun out from 18 discussion -- paul to set up telcon for monday 12 Nov, 9-10a PST Present Asir Vendamuthu Marc Hadley Paul Cotton David Fallside (scribe) Jacek Kopecky 1. Review of action items 2. Discusison of issue #18 Asir reported back on discussions with his developers: (a) multiref w/ frefs requires 2 pass, (b) frefs are not required for anything, (c) frefs might be a sep issue, (d) ??? PaulC's developers disagreed, (a) that 2 passes are required, (b) frefs are not required for cyclic graphs ETF agreed to propose resolution of issue #18 by represent multirefs as embedded elements rather than as separate elements. [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Oct/0231.html