Talk:WebSchemas/FictionalThing
From W3C Wiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
We might also need a '''part_of_Organization''' property as well, since many FictionalThing's are part_of or belong_to an Organization. [[User:Tguidry|Thad Guidry]] 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | We might also need a '''part_of_Organization''' property as well, since many FictionalThing's are part_of or belong_to an Organization. [[User:Tguidry|Thad Guidry]] 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | * Is '''part_of_Organization''' not an attribute of Things in general that may or may not be fictional? [[User:Rwallis|Richard Wallis]] 14:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Another consideration is the need for '''FictionalUniverse''' where sometimes the FictionalThing is also a part_of one or many FictionalUniverse. In Freebase, we used FictionalUniverse to represent a separate concern from a BookSeries or FictionalSeries. However, a FictionalUniverse can be used to represent the same idea of a Franchise or Market that holds the characters, locations, and fictional works under a single Type. Marvel Universe (or just Marvel in marketing), Earthsea, Star Trek, Star Wars, Shrek, Hello Kitty, Dune universe (or just Dune in marketing), etc. [[User:Tguidry|Thad Guidry]] 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | Another consideration is the need for '''FictionalUniverse''' where sometimes the FictionalThing is also a part_of one or many FictionalUniverse. In Freebase, we used FictionalUniverse to represent a separate concern from a BookSeries or FictionalSeries. However, a FictionalUniverse can be used to represent the same idea of a Franchise or Market that holds the characters, locations, and fictional works under a single Type. Marvel Universe (or just Marvel in marketing), Earthsea, Star Trek, Star Wars, Shrek, Hello Kitty, Dune universe (or just Dune in marketing), etc. [[User:Tguidry|Thad Guidry]] 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think we need to be careful about loading too many properties on to this, keeping it easy to apply. For instance, createdIn would reference a CreativeWork which will/should have a creator which would duplicate a createdBy property. Again I am wondering if a FictionalUniverse is not a CreativeWork in its own right that a FictionalThing would be createdIn or referencedIn. [[User:Rwallis|Richard Wallis]] 14:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 15 February 2013
We need a created_by property as well (Stan Lee created the FictionalThing "Spiderman") Thad Guidry 13:32, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
We might also need a part_of_Organization property as well, since many FictionalThing's are part_of or belong_to an Organization. Thad Guidry 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Is part_of_Organization not an attribute of Things in general that may or may not be fictional? Richard Wallis 14:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Another consideration is the need for FictionalUniverse where sometimes the FictionalThing is also a part_of one or many FictionalUniverse. In Freebase, we used FictionalUniverse to represent a separate concern from a BookSeries or FictionalSeries. However, a FictionalUniverse can be used to represent the same idea of a Franchise or Market that holds the characters, locations, and fictional works under a single Type. Marvel Universe (or just Marvel in marketing), Earthsea, Star Trek, Star Wars, Shrek, Hello Kitty, Dune universe (or just Dune in marketing), etc. Thad Guidry 13:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I think we need to be careful about loading too many properties on to this, keeping it easy to apply. For instance, createdIn would reference a CreativeWork which will/should have a creator which would duplicate a createdBy property. Again I am wondering if a FictionalUniverse is not a CreativeWork in its own right that a FictionalThing would be createdIn or referencedIn. Richard Wallis 14:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
