HCLSIG/LODD/Meetings/2010-06-23 Conference Call

From W3C Wiki
< HCLSIG‎ | LODD‎ | Meetings
Revision as of 15:53, 23 June 2010 by Ewilligh (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Conference Details

  • Date of Call: Wednesday June 23, 2010
  • Time of Call: 11:00am Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), 16:00 British Summer Time (BST), 17:00 Central European Time (CET)
  • Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
  • Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
  • Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
  • Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS").
  • IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS (see W3C IRC page for details, or see Web IRC)
  • Duration: ~1h
  • Convener: Susie

Agenda

  • Data Interlinking Track, Ontology Alignment Evalutation Initiative Follow Up - Susie
  • Other Data updates - Egon, Matthias, Anja, Oktie
  • Mapping experimental data - All
  • Outreach (TCM, ACS) - All
  • AOB

Minutes

 [06/23/10 17:09] <rboyce> susie: recap of previous meeting
 [06/23/10 17:10] <Susie> [1]
 [06/23/10 17:10] <rboyce> scribenick: rboyce
 [06/23/10 17:10] <Susie> [2]
 [06/23/10 17:11] <rboyce> topic: ontology alignment initiative
 [06/23/10 17:11] <rboyce> Francois Scharffe et al have selected LODD nodes of interest
 [06/23/10 17:12] <rboyce> from group perspective -- wait for feedback
 [06/23/10 17:12] <rboyce> agenda other data updates:
 [06/23/10 17:13] <rboyce> rxnorm -- 
 [06/23/10 17:13] <janos> [3]
 [06/23/10 17:14] <rboyce> added ~35K links to dailymed using OWL "same-as"
 [06/23/10 17:15] <rboyce> links from drug product in rxnorm to dailymed label
 [06/23/10 17:15] <rboyce> why not link to RDF version?
 [06/23/10 17:16] <janos> [4]
 [06/23/10 17:17] <rboyce> using ID a document ID
 [06/23/10 17:17] <rboyce> not present in RDF
 [06/23/10 17:18] <rboyce> will this document id change when dailymed labels change?
 [06/23/10 17:19] <rboyce> how could we avoid dead links
 [06/23/10 17:19] <rboyce> might be able to link on active-moiety or chemical id
 [06/23/10 17:20] <Susie> exploring using lodd 
 [06/23/10 17:20] <Susie> especially dailymed, and to some extent drugbank
 [06/23/10 17:20] <Susie> want to pull out labels
 [06/23/10 17:20] <Susie> using nlp to see information about pharmacokinetics
 [06/23/10 17:21] <Susie> see if other information that supplements the product label
 [06/23/10 17:21] <Susie> the poc exposed some issues in those data sources
 [06/23/10 17:21] <Susie> been trying to contact Anja
 [06/23/10 17:22] * egonw is booting the computer for Skype to call in
 [06/23/10 17:23] <rboyce> offering to mirror LODD at U of Pitt
 [06/23/10 17:23] <rboyce> maintain DailyMed and DrugBank note
 [06/23/10 17:25] <rboyce> todo: Rich -- try to get fixes working with Anja and then discuss how to mirror or maintain nodes
 [06/23/10 17:25] <rboyce> would possibly need to get a persistent URL 
 [06/23/10 17:26] <rboyce> would make sense to generate persistent URLs for new data sources moving forward (where possible)
 [06/23/10 17:27] <rboyce> Susie suggests being opportunistic about the use of persistant URLs
 [06/23/10 17:27] <rboyce> no other updates
 [06/23/10 17:27] <rboyce> agenda item: outreach
 [06/23/10 17:27] <rboyce> paper on traditional chinese medicine will be published
 [06/23/10 17:28] <rboyce> Egon -- hosting a session on linked data at ACS in the fall (Boston)
 [06/23/10 17:28] <rboyce> Eric will present on LODD at same conference
 [06/23/10 17:28] <rboyce> agenda item: mapping experimental data to RDF
 [06/23/10 17:29] <rboyce> not much progress to date -- is this aligned with interest of group?
 [06/23/10 17:30] <rboyce> there is a paper on mapping some experimental data to RDF 
 [06/23/10 17:30] <rboyce> how about taking that paper and extending it to create some guidelines for W3C?
 [06/23/10 17:31] <Susie> [5]
 [06/23/10 17:32] <rboyce> Rich is interested for drug safety / post-market reasons
 [06/23/10 17:33] <rboyce> most agree that the mapping effort would be of interest to several in the group
 [06/23/10 17:33] <rboyce> Susie will share copy of the accepted paper with group -- give feedback if we could build on this work.
 [06/23/10 17:34] <rboyce> Proposed team goal: commit to reading by next phone call
 [06/23/10 17:34] * egonw managed to get skyped in
 [06/23/10 17:35] <rboyce> discuss at the next call -- what is useful?
 [06/23/10 17:36] <rboyce> Also -- read content of Wiki page ([6])
 [06/23/10 17:36] <rboyce> Edits -- make directly on the Wiki page -- more controversial issues; please discuss at next meeting.
 [06/23/10 17:36] <rboyce> Action 1) Susie will post paper
 [06/23/10 17:37] <rboyce> Action 2) group -- read the paper
 [06/23/10 17:37] <rboyce> Action 3) assess if the content on the wiki page makes sense and if the components in the paper will address the isseus that have been raised
 [06/23/10 17:38] <rboyce> potential grant opportunities?
 [06/23/10 17:38] <rboyce> Susie - seed grants from pharma
 [06/23/10 17:39] <rboyce> now apply more to informatics
 [06/23/10 17:41] <rboyce> grant proposals should probably have a strong applications focus
 [06/23/10 17:41] <rboyce> Susie will post information on next call