Re: ISSUE-66 image-analysis: informal consensus check

i also support the removal of the text for the spec.

regards
steve

On 29 April 2010 09:22, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 29.04.2010 07:08, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> The Chairs would like to proceed towards resolving this issue. We have
>> the following proposals submitted:
>>
>> Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
>> accessibility.
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
>> (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)
>>
>> Change Proposal: There is no problem and the proposed remedy is to
>> change nothing.
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0194.html
>>
>> Change Proposal: Include more detail about possible image repair
>> techniques.
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Mar/0195.html
>>
>> I'd like to check whether we are close to consensus on any of these
>> options. If so, we will seek amicable resolution. If not, then the
>> chairs will likely proceed to resolve the issue by other means, such as
>> via survey.
>> ...
>
> I support
>
>> Change Proposal: Strike paragraph allowing image analysis for
>> accessibility.
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImageHeuristics
>> (Recently endorsed by the A11Y Task Force.)
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html

Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:14:17 UTC