- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:22:56 +0200
- To: "Bob Lund" <B.Lund@cablelabs.com>, "Jean-Claude Dufourd" <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>, "Giuseppe Pascale" <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:04:29 +0200, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: > > Some comment on the current text: > ** maybe would be better to change "document" with something more generic > In general I see 2 things we want to be able to move: services and > content. > The "document" case is probably a but ambiguous since it could be > regarded both as a service and as content. > In your case would be probably better to use service though, so saying > somethin like "A service moving across devices", "how do we move a > service and its current "state" to another device" etc. > > So a document would be a specific case for a more general case of > service migration. This also imply that you need a mechanism for devices > to negotiate a supported "service" type > What do you think? > > @Bob, > Would this address also your comment? > > Note that this would require a clear definition of "service" that should > include things like, for example, a Remote UI. > Here some simple changes to the current text http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/index.php?title=HNTF%2FHome_Network_TF_Discussions%2FServiceMigration%2Fcomments_gp1&diff=327&oldid=326 -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:23:50 UTC