Re: ISSUE-3 (async-style): Asynchrnonous calls style [APIs â General] from Arve Bersvendsen on 2009-08-31 (public-device-apis@w3.org from August 2009)

From: Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:12:14 +0200
To: "Device APIs and Policy Working Group WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uzjjmo1dbyn2jm@galactica>

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:08:36 +0200, Device APIs and Policy Working Group  
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

>
> ISSUE-3 (async-style): Asynchrnonous calls style [APIs — General]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/3
>
> Raised by: Robin Berjon
> On product: APIs — General
>
> We need to pick a common style for asynchronous calls (handles for  
> cancellation, DOM Events or not, etc.).

I'll ask the same question I did for ISSUE-2: Do we really? Whether  
something is a callback or event, or is cancellable or not would depend on  
the particular use-case, no?

-- 
Arve Bersvendsen

Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 19:13:02 UTC