- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:20:47 +0200
- To: "SVG Working Group WG" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:23:54 +0200, SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > ISSUE-2256 (font-face-dtd): DTD allows <font-face> only as a child of <font> [SVG Full 1.1] > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2256 > > Raised by: Cameron McCormack > On product: SVG Full 1.1 > > The SVG 1.1 DTD allows <font-face> only as a child of <font>, while the Fonts chapter implies that it need not be a child of <font>. Some tests in the test suite have <font-face> as a child of a graphical container element rather than <font>. > > This is inconsistent with the SVG 1.0 DTD, too. Really? See http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/errata/errata.xml#font_module_add_fontface (adds 'font-face' to SVG.Font.class in the spec). I think the DTD was correct, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/svgdtd.html has 'font' and 'font-face' in SVG.Font.class as it should be, and SVG.Font.class seems to be included in all the elements that should have it (though it's not in SVG.Structure.class). -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 08:19:53 UTC