minor editorial nits from Anne van Kesteren on 2010-02-12 (public-bpwg-comments@w3.org from January to March 2010)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:58:05 +0100
To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u70gq30u64w2qv@annevk-t60>

Hey,

I don't really have any comments on 4.1.2 and 4.1.3. They seem fine, apart  
 from these nits:

1. The reference to XMLHttpRequest is out of date (the draft also had a  
small name change).
2. XMLHttpRequest is not consistently marked up in the draft. I suggest  
you simply use it as a name and not use <code> (unless you actually  
reference the object and not the concept).
3. The time it is present in code XML is not completely in uppercase. That  
is wrong.

Cheers,


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 10:58:39 UTC