- From: Shelley Powers <shelley.just@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:30:27 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 30.04.2010 13:27, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> ... >> Just a passing observation: if there isn't consensus, the next step is >> to look for which proposals have would attract the weakest objections. >> Knowledge of which proposals each of you might support is no where near >> as useful as knowing which proposals you would actively object to, which >> in turn is no where near as useful as knowing the basis for such >> objections. >> ... > > Another observation: I think everything that can be said about this topic > already has been said. So do we do another round of email exchanges about > this, or do we move to a survey? (just checking, because I don't want to > repeat myself over and over). > > Best regards, Julian > > I agree with Julian -- this one has had _considerable_ discussion. I don't think we'll reach consensus in the email list. I think it's time to move on to the next phase. Shelley
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 15:30:59 UTC