- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:55:35 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
nicholascar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: == Generalise diagrams == Internal comments like [1] and some external ones indicate it's not appropriate to assume all classes in PROF diagrams are OWL classes. They could be RDFS classes and perhaps should be OWL/RDFS non-specific altogether. Suggested actions: * generalise PROF diagram keys to remove references to OWL/RDFS * evaluate diagrams to see if they match 'plain' (non-RDF) diagram expectations (like UML) * compare with DCAT & other W3C specs for expectations * review all diagrams and their keys for consistency [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2019Mar/0456.html Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/826 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 18 March 2019 01:55:37 UTC