- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 17:05:41 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>, www-tag@w3.org
One probably tangential query: [1] says
"The extension graph, if provided, must be true under the semantic
conditions of the extension."
This seems an odd constraint, if I read it correctly. By construction
the reserved IRIs of an extension will all be _mentioned_ in its
extension graph. But it seems unlikely that they will be _used_ in it
in most cases. And if any of them are, why does "eat your own
cooking" need to be the case, as the above quote requires?
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/AnotherSpin
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 16:08:47 UTC