Re: again, canonicalization, and adoption

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Elliotte Harold writes:

> Worth noting: you don't have this problem if you only do whole
> document canonicalization.

I think it's important to emphasise this point - it reduces the
'at risk' situations considerably.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFDDtffkjnJixAXWBoRAiIgAJiDMfP22Xx7QO2+ioA4GME5Ak8eAJ9ifiA9
sW0pOe8Rx/HJaFCmcmCZ9w==
=DVdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 26 August 2005 08:51:03 UTC