Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility)

Ian Hickson wrote:
> Just because it's not documented doesn't mean it wasn't considered
> carefully, though. Maybe next time we meet in person we can spend a few
> hours going through the process of considering the proposals you have
> raised, and then you can document the reasoning for me? That would be very
> helpful, I'm sure a lot of people would be interested in

Instead of waiting, might I suggest a wiki page in which many others
can contribute?  Wiki pages were started on these proposals at one
point earlier in the process, though I seem to have lost those links.
These pages would probably be a good starting point.  In this way you
don't have to document everything up front in a big burst of activity,
but you can add to the reasoning as your hands will permit :)

Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2008 20:48:24 UTC