- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:38:05 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17854 --- Comment #4 from Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> --- No. It isn't self evident. Otherwise I wouldn't have to spend a lot of time telling developers about it. This is a common problem because it is rarely talked about and implementers forget that what we call "floating" times can't be converted to incremental time values safely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 30 December 2012 06:39:41 UTC