[Bug 14049] New: Can you avoid the awkward situation of different defaults (content vs idl) for the size attribute by simply moving the 1 or 4 part to the paragraph about display size and not saying anything about the default value of the size content attribute? That wou

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14049

           Summary: Can you avoid the awkward situation of different
                    defaults (content vs idl) for the size attribute by
                    simply moving the 1 or 4 part to the paragraph about
                    display size and not saying anything about the default
                    value of the size content attribute?  That wou
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the
                    -select-element
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-button-element.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#the-select-element
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#the-select-element

Comment:
Can you avoid the awkward situation of different defaults (content vs idl) for
the size attribute by simply moving the 1 or 4 part to the paragraph about
display size and not saying anything about the default value of the size
content attribute?  That would be cleaner if the 1 or 4 values aren't used
anywhere else.

Posted from: 66.114.38.251
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0a2)
Gecko/20110902 Firefox/8.0a2

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 17:24:30 UTC