[Bug 12967] New: I feel this part is not clear enough. When should the developers call update()? Should they call update() before swapCache()? Must swapCache() be called before reload? I've tried that even without calling swapCache(), once manifest changed, the file will

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12967

           Summary: I feel this part is not clear enough. When should the
                    developers call update()? Should they call update()
                    before swapCache()? Must swapCache() be called before
                    reload? I've tried that even without calling
                    swapCache(), once manifest changed, the file will
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#app
                    lication-cache-api
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/offline.html
Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#application-cache-api

Comment:
I feel this part is not clear enough. When should the developers call
update()? Should they call update() before swapCache()? Must swapCache() be
called before reload? I've tried that even without calling swapCache(), once
manifest changed, the file will get updated after a reload.

Posted from: 2620:0:10a0:2:3451:c06d:3bea:9c69
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.24 Safari/535.1

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 06:53:48 UTC