[Bug 12539] New: The numeric references to produce the gyphs in the third column should use the characters listed in the second columns. lang (and aliases) list (correctly) U+27ea, but the glyph is produced by #9001 (U+2329) which is not in normal form C and generates va

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12539

           Summary: The numeric references to produce the gyphs in the
                    third column should use the characters listed in the
                    second columns. lang (and aliases)  list (correctly)
                    U+27ea, but the glyph is produced by #9001 (U+2329)
                    which is not in normal form C and generates va
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#nam
                    ed-character-references-table
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/named-character-references.html
Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#named-character-references-table

Comment:
The numeric references to produce the gyphs in the third column should use the
characters listed in the second columns. lang (and aliases)  list (correctly)
U+27ea, but the glyph is produced by #9001 (U+2329) which is not in normal
form C and generates validation errors in (eg) validaor.nu

Posted from: 80.177.31.128
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
Firefox/4.0.1

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 13:03:16 UTC