[Bug 10380] New: "the content attribute must be set to the conforming value associated with the state that the attribute would be in if set to the given new value". Does this imply in canonical case? Browsers seem to preserve the case when you do an IDL set. This alert

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10380

           Summary: "the content attribute must be set to the conforming
                    value associated with the state that the attribute
                    would be in if set to the given new value".  Does this
                    imply in canonical case?  Browsers seem to preserve
                    the case when you do an IDL set.  This alert
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#ref
                    lecting-content-attributes-in-idl-attributes
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org


Section:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#reflecting-content-attributes-in-idl-attributes

Comment:
"the content attribute must be set to the conforming value associated with the
state that the attribute would be in if set to the given new value".  Does
this imply in canonical case?  Browsers seem to preserve the case when you do
an IDL set.  This alerts "tExT" in Firefox, Chrome, and Opera:
data:text/html,<!doctype html><script>var el =
document.createElement("input"); el.type = "tExT";
alert(el.getAttribute("type"));</script>

Posted from: 68.175.61.233

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 23:20:06 UTC