Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-01-16

I will be there for the beginning. I have a meeting that starts at
9:30 waaaay over on the other end of campus, with multiple high level
people involved, i.e. I will leave early.

On Jan 15, 2008 10:37 PM, Serge Egelman <egelman@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> Regrets.
>
> serge
>
> Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> >
> >         Web Security Context (WSC) Call Agenda
> >
> > Calling information:
> > Wednesday, 16 January 2008
> > 11:00 am - 12:30 pm Eastern time
> > _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/#meetings_
> > _http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20080116_
> > <http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#D20071031>
>
> >
> >
> > Agenda
> >
> > 1) Pick a scribe
> > _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/cheatsheet#Scribing_
> > _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/scribes_
> >
> > 2. Approve mintues from meetings
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/01/09-wsc-minutes.html
> >
> > 3) Weekly completed action items
> > [Pending review] ACTION-214: Bill Doyle to solicit commentary on Threat
> > Trees from MITRE INFOSEC community - due 2007-12-30
> > [Pending review] ACTION-353: Johnathan Nightingale to Convert his fwpd
> > review notes into issues against the document - due 2008-01-04
> >
> > 4) Open Action Items
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
> >
> > 5) Action items closed due to inactivity
> > None, but a lot of frustration with people who ignore their action item
> > due dates.
> >
> > 6) Agenda bashing
> >
> > 7) ISSUE-128 - Strong / weak algorithms?
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/128
> > I can't believe we don't have a next step, but darned if I can figure
> > out what it is.
> >
> > 8) ISSUE-124 - Safe Form Bar: reliable text
> > _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/124_
> > No obvious next steps. We'll figure out what they are.
> >
> > 9) ISSUE-125 - Safe Form Bar: on screen masking phrased in terms of
> > visual agents
> > _http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/125_
> > No obvious next steps. We'll figure out what they are.
> >
> > 10)ISSUE-129 - Should we say anything about scoring techniques?
> > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/129
> > No obvious next step, but a lot of good recent discussion. It's time to
> > figure out the next steps.
> >
> > 11) Next meeting - 23 January 2008
> > I'll be fresh off two hours at the dentist; should be interesting.
> > We'll do more Issues without obvious next steps
> >
> > We've done a lot of review and discussion of xit. It's time to step back
> > and consider the larger picture. Perhaps a better topic for the f2f.
> > I'll do some thinking and send out some email on it.
> >
>
> --
> /*
> PhD Candidate
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
> "Whoever said there's no such thing as a free lunch was never a grad
> student."
>
> All views contained in this message, either expressed or implied, are
> the views of my employer, and not my own.
> */
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 06:41:42 UTC