- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 02/28/2011 05:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > On 02/28/2011 04:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > > > > > The point that is being made here is that your CP introduces the > > > > problem anew in HTML. If the chairs adopt the proposal as written, I > > > > would expect to subsequently file bugs to fix the proposal to actually > > > > be well-defined again. (Since I do not think that the proposal is an > > > > improvement to the Web, however, I have not spent the time to work out > > > > how one would go about doing that yet.) > > > > > > Does Philip's stated objection sufficiently cover this point? > > > > No idea. > > In which case I encourage you (and everybody, for that matter) to ensure > that whatever points you feel need to be made here are made (or > referenced) by the survey itself. I do not believe I have any points to make that are relevant to the survey that are not in my change proposal. I don't have a problem with the working group adopting an incomplete proposal that is later fixed through bug reports; many proposals start off incomplete and are later fixed as problems are discovered. I was just attempting to clarify the situation for Julian's benefit. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 00:00:46 UTC