Re: Null change proposal for ISSUE-31

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > 
> > Could you clarify exactly which "current text" it is that needs 
> > justifying?
> 
> 1) Steve's change proposal calls for deleting sections between these two 
> inclusive:
> 
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#a-link-or-button-containing-nothing-but-the-image
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#an-image-in-an-e-mail-or-private-document-intended-for-a-specific-person-who-is-known-to-be-able-to-view-images
> 
> And suggests replacing them with a link to the alt techniques document.
> 
> Rationale should be provided for the current text in that range of 
> sections.

Would it be acceptable for me to provide rationale to the same level of 
depth as Steve's change proposal provides for removing this text, or 
should I provide detailed rationale on a requirement-by-requirement basis?

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 06:45:44 UTC