- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:24:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Could you please check if the specced behavior for > http://hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/dom/level0/write/005.html is the wanted > behavior and then write down what the wanted result is? (I'm not sure I > got it right myself.) I've updated the test to match what the spec says (and to more dramatically demonstrate why I think what it says is substantially preferable than what WebKit and Gecko do today). > Also, have I understood correctly that insertion point is never > undefined when there's an active parser that is a script-created parser > and the tokenizer isn't tokenizing the synchronous part of a > document.write()? Not sure what you mean by the second part. The insertion point is never undefined when there's an active script-creaed parser full stop. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:24:42 UTC