- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 03:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > I would encourage you to review and update the following wiki page: > > > > > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/SummaryForTABLE > > > > Could you elaborate on how you would like me to update it? > > Per action 126[1], I would like to see that the Wiki page adequately reflects > both (all) viewpoints. If you have nothing to add at this time, that's fine. Could you help me understand how this wiki page is to be used? I don't understand how to edit it. It contains such vaccuous arguments as: "A summary provides a reasonable accommodation. It enables a person with a visual disability to have an equal opportunity. Not providing a summary mechanism excludes people solely on the basis of disability. Removing it would be discrimination." What kind of content should I add? What structure is going to be of most help in finding consensus? Without a clear statement from you about what process you intend to follow to obtain consensus, I have no idea what such a wiki page should look like. I don't know what information would be useful. Should I just copy my entire e-mail into the wiki page? (My e-mail covered everything I think is relevant, along with references to relevant data.) > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/128 > > > > Could you elaborate? What should we do together? > > "Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF". Ok. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 03:50:58 UTC