Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP?

Hi Ashok,

We discussed this as part of ISSUE-28 and agreed we would not deal with 
transactions, at least in this version of the spec.
You could add it to the wish list though: 
http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/LDPNext

As for your email on Acces Control, all I can say is that people seem to 
have been busy with other things lately and we are not seeing much 
activity on the list. This will need to change quickly or we won't be able 
to stay on schedule.

Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




From:   Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:     "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, 
Date:   05/09/2013 06:45 AM
Subject:        Do we need transaction support in LDP?



Do we need transaction support in LDP?  One of the big features of LDP wrt 
to the
rest of the Web is that it is read/write.  If clients can update 
information then we need
to say something about transaction support.   This could be along the 
lines of the note
on Access Control.

BTW, I have not seen any comments on my latest suggestion re. Access 
Control.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Apr/0109.html
Please take a look and comment.
-- 
All the best, Ashok