- From: <erik@lexmark.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:59:45 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFDDB672F7.C884A90C-ON85256D36.0059F044-85256D36.005D6802@lexmark.com>
W3C Web Service - Description weekly conference call 29 May 2003 See also: IRC Log <http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-ws-desc-irc#T16-16-22> Present: Erik Ackerman Lexmark Mike Ballantyne Electronic Data Systems David Booth W3C Allen Brookes Rogue Wave Software Roberto Chinnici Sun Microsystems Martin Gudgin Microsoft Sandeep Kumar Cisco Systems Philippe Le Hégaret W3C Amelia Lewis TIBCO Steve Lind AT&T Lily Liu webMethods Jonathan Marsh Chair (Microsoft) Dale Moberg Cyclone Commerce Adi Sakala IONA Technologies Jeffrey Schlimmer Microsoft Igor Sedukhin Computer Associates Jerry Thrasher Lexmark William Vambenepe Hewlett-Packard Umit Yalcinalp Oracle Regrets: Glen Daniels Macromedia Youenn Fablet Canon Dietmar Gaertner Software AG Steve Graham Global Grid Forum Tom Jordahl Macromedia Jacek Kopecky Systinet Kevin Canyang Liu SAP Ingo Melzer DaimlerChrysler Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle Jean-Jacques Moreau Canon Arthur Ryman IBM Sanjiva Weerawarana IBM Prasad Yendluri webMethods, Inc. 3. Review of Action items [.1]. RETIRED 2003-03-04: Editors to discuss markup for testable assertions in the spec and come back with a strategy. PENDING 2003-03-13: Don will write a proposal for annotating schema with part information. PENDING 2003-03-27: Philippe write up a proposal for embedding binary data types in schema DONE [.2] 2003-05-01: Jonathan to summarize WS Desc interest for XML Schema subset to XML Schema WG. DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors to add (non-normative) pseudo-syntax description of each component. PENDING 2003-05-12: Jonathan to work on auto generating pseudo-syntax from schema. DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors add more context to the specification - provide more descriptive wording to make it easier for someone to read the specification and to relate to Web services etc. before jumping into component-by-component descriptions. DONE [.3] 2003-05-12: Jonathan to take the above points to the XMLP/CG worlds and see what to do next. DONE [.4] 2003-05-12: Editors to reflect decision to have one interface per <service>, add new attribute "interface" to <service>, and add "resource" attribute to <service>. PENDING 2003-05-13: Umit to write up a variant of the endpoint description proposal using schema annotation syntax. PENDING 2003-05-13: DaveO to send a motivating example for R131. PENDING 2003-05-13: Jeffsch, Sanjiva, Glen, Umit, JJM to come up with a proposal to get rid with the message construct, and add programming hints. PENDING 2003-05-14: Kevin to contact Sanjiva and try to merge proposals. PENDING 2003-05-22: Jacek to see how test assertions could be expressed in RDF (and OWL in particular). [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2003May/0011.html [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2003May/0063.htm l [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0051.html 4. Administrivia New member: Alan Davies (SeeBeyond) replacing Stephen White a. July FTF [.1] RSVP for Wed. dinner [.4] Will do a SARS check next week and consider a fallback plan. b. Publishing date. Gudge has changes in current draft. c. XMLP request for WSDL WG to develop WSDL 1.1 binding for SOAP 1.2 [.2]. SoapBuilders proposal [.3] Jonathan will tell them that the proposal looks fine. Additional SOAP 1.2 features will be addressed in WSDL 1.2. d. OASIS-W3C Web Services technical plenary [.5] Yes, we're interested. [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/3/05/f2fJulyLogistics.htm [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2003May/0064.html [.3] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soapbuilders/message/7431 [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0049.html [.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2003May/0057.html 5. Task Force Status Skipped until next week 6. New Issues Skipped until next week 7. Using RDF in WSDL Skipped until next week 8. Proposal: rationalization of faults in patterns. Amy proposes that the MEPs can be simplified by observing that there are only two rules for faults used in the patterns [.1]. By listing these rules separately and only specifying which rule a given pattern uses, the patterns can be simplified. David Booth strongly seconded the proposal. We will leave it on the agenda for next week, as attendance is low this week. [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0085.html 9. Simplification for HTTP binding for WSDL 1.2 There was a consensus to adopt the proposal. It is already in the current draft. [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0063.html 10. Issue 6e: No matching part [.1] Consensus to adopt Jeffrey's proposal [.2] [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x6e [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0067.html 11. Issue 71: Optional message content in http:urlReplacement [.1] Consensus to adopt Jeffrey's proposal [.2] [.1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x71 [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0068.html 12. Issue 2: SOAPAction has been deprecated as of SOAP 1.2 [.1] Skipped since Glen and Arthur are absent 13. R085 Describing endpoint references [.1] Waiting for proposal from Umit [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Apr/att-0088/R085-2003-04-22.html 14. Binding enhancements Waiting for Sanjiva & Kevin to consolidate proposals 15 Removing message Waiting for proposal from Jeffrey 16 Moving MIME Type information to the Interface [.1] Waiting for proposal from Philippe [.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Mar/0028.html
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 13:18:06 UTC