Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?

Hi Holger,
Indeed you should simply reply to the list. Any email message that 
contains the issue number as in "ISSUE-2" will be automatically linked 
under "related emails" on the issue (if tracker is set properly - I'm 
having some doubts right now because of the prefix that showed up in the 
subject and that I don't expect).
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM 
Software Group


Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> wrote on 11/18/2014 03:07:24 PM:

> From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 11/18/2014 03:10 PM
> Subject: Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What 
> skills is  expected/required from our audience?
> 
> Forgive my ignorance (I am new to W3C processes), but could someone 
> explain how such recorded Issues are being usually discussed? I went 
> ahead and added a "Related note" to this ticket here, and expected an 
> email update to be copied to the mailing list, but this apparently 
> hasn't happened. So are we supposed to respond on the email list 
directly?
> 
> Thanks
> Holger
> 
> 
> On 11/19/2014 3:15, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> > rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is 
> expected/required from our audience?
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/2
> >
> > Raised by: Arnaud Le Hors
> > On product:
> >
> > We've started discussing who the audience for Shapes is but what 
> have not discussed what skills the audience is expected to have.
> > We can assume general understanding of the basic RDF data model 
> but what about RDFS, SPARQL, and OWL? Can we expect users of Shapes 
> to be expert in these? Anything else?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>