Re: rdf language tag contraints

Karen,

I created ISSUE-137, mentioning ISSUE-35
I guess this is the proper way to do it.

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl
# Esdoornstraat 3
# 3461ER Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
##############################################################



From:   Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
To:     Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
Cc:     public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date:   14-03-2016 22:42
Subject:        Re: rdf language tag contraints



ISSUE-35 is closed. I think this needs to be a new issue, can refer to 
ISSUE-35 outcome, and the message is: add this functionality to the 
SHACL specification. (Arnaud, if this isn't the right procedure, pls 
advise.)

kc

On 3/14/16 1:45 PM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> I'll pick it up,
>
> it is still related to ISSUE-35 right ?
>
> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> Bart van Leeuwen
>
> ##############################################################
> # twitter: @semanticfire
> # netage.nl
> # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/>
> # Esdoornstraat 3
> # 3461ER Linschoten
> # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> ##############################################################
>
>
>
> From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
> To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
> Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
> Date: 14-03-2016 21:43
> Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> I believe we need an issue to make sure this gets discussed. I can
> create that if you wish, or you can do it.
>
> kc
>
> On 3/14/16 9:17 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
>  > Hi Karen,
>  >
>  > Thanks for the follow up, does this mean that a constrained in SHACL
>  > should also be added ?
>  >
>  > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
>  > Bart van Leeuwen
>  >
>  > ##############################################################
>  > # twitter: @semanticfire
>  > # netage.nl
>  > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/>
>  > # Esdoornstraat 3
>  > # 3461ER Linschoten
>  > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
>  > ##############################################################
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
>  > To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
>  > Date: 14-03-2016 15:44
>  > Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints
>  > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Bart, thanks. I followed up on the history and it was indeed voted to
>  > become a requirement, but wasn't added. I will add it to the
>  > requirements list in the UC&R.
>  >
>  > kc
>  >
>  > On 3/13/16 9:46 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
>  >  > Hi All,
>  >  >
>  >  > Seeing all the productive discussions and positive vibe on the 
list I
>  >  > sat down and read the current Editors draft of SHACL [1]
>  >  >
>  >  > One of the things that strike me is that I cannot have a simple
>  >  > constraint on a language tag.
>  >  >
>  >  > e.g. I need rdfs:label with '@en' for my application.
>  >  >
>  >  > I do see a example in the "Native Constraints" section [2] but 
that
>  >  > looks rather complex for my use case.
>  >  > On the issue tracker I did find ISSUE-35 [3] which resolves in
> allowing
>  >  > constraints on the language tag.
>  >  >
>  >  > I tried searching the mailing list archive but 'Language' is so
>  >  > ambiguous that it didn't help me answer this question from the
> archive.
>  >  >
>  >  > Why is the use case mentioned in Issue 35 not there any more, and
> why is
>  >  > there no simple way constraint on the language of a literal?
>  >  >
>  >  > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/
>  >  > [2]
> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#an-example-native-constraint
>  >  > [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/35
>  >  >
>  >  > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
>  >  > Bart van Leeuwen
>  >  >
>  >  > ##############################################################
>  >  > # twitter: @semanticfire
>  >  > # netage.nl
>  >  > # http://netage.nl
> <http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/>
>  >  > # Esdoornstraat 3
>  >  > # 3461ER Linschoten
>  >  > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
>  >  > ##############################################################
>  >
>  > --
>  > Karen Coyle
>  > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> <http://kcoyle.net/><http://kcoyle.net/>
>  > m: 1-510-435-8234
>  > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net <http://kcoyle.net/>
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600