Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote on 07/29/2008 09:36:03 AM: > > On Jul 29, 2008, at 15:00, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > It might turn out that namespace prefixes in a few well defined > > places is possible, or that the predictable error recovery currently > > specified can be tweaked (while still retaining the quality of being > > predictable). > > Indeed, it seems feasible to have a reasonable number of attribute > names that have hard-wired prefixes That is, indeed, one possibility. My larger point is that there is a spectrum between the full-on bells and whistles approach to XML namespaces that was explored and rejected a half a decade ago and a no-namespaces, no-how, under no circumstances approach to namespaces that was present in HTML5 a mere few months ago. And exploring the solution space for the potential of small movements along that spectrum should not require "radical new evidence". - Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:26:34 UTC