Re: Can ISSUE-7 be closed?

This is fine with me. I'd like Andy to weigh in on this though since he's 
the one who opened issue-7.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote on 11/06/2012 01:09:36 AM:

> From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
> To: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, 
> Date: 11/06/2012 01:10 AM
> Subject: Can ISSUE-7 be closed?
> 
> Housekeeping.
> 
>   ISSUE-7: What operations are permitted on containers and how do 
> they get invoked
>   https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/7
> 
> I believe that this can be closed because the concern it addresses 
> is partially answered by the following resolution:
> 
>   Make the containers in the spec be about Strong Composition, then 
accept
>   proposals for how to do weak aggregation. And separate proposals for
>   paging, etc.
>   http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-02#resolution_1
> 
> And I believe that any remaining unresolved concerns fit under the 
> following new issues:
> 
>   ISSUE-33: Pagination for non-container resources
>   https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/33
> 
>   ISSUE-34: Adding and removing arcs in weak aggregation
>   https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/34
> 
> Therefore:
> 
>   PROPOSAL: Close ISSUE-7; related concerns will be addressed under 
> ISSUE-33 and ISSUE-34.
> 
> If there are other remaining concerns related to ISSUE-7 that are 
> not covered by 33 and 34 or other existing issues, then it would be 
> good to get them captured more explicitly.
> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
>