- From: Mark Phillips <M8PHILLI@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:27:11 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
With reference to Issue 19 - "In 2.6.2.3. the behaviour of the responding node is too prescriptive about the destination to which the response must be sent" [1], I agree with the consensus reached in the call of 2010-03-02 [2] that is, because the Binding specification is based on the SOAP request-response MEP, then the request-response in the spec. is correct as it stands and should not be changed . Further discussion in the 2010-03-02 call was around the use of the one-way SOAP/JMS MEP for response messages (for example as a reply message when a non-anonymous replyTo address is used in WS-Addressing). A concern was raised that our one-way MEP description was expressed in terms of 'requests' and that we might need to reword section 2.7 [3] to ensure that it could apply to request, response, or any other message type. However, I have reviewed this section, and believe that no changes are required. I therefore propose that we close both ACTION-148 and Issue 29 with no further action being required. [1] - http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/29 [2] - http://www.w3.org/2010/03/02-soap-jms-minutes.html [3] - http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html#binding-one-way Regards Mark
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 11:29:31 UTC