- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:45:49 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 17:46:19 UTC
On Jan 7, 2013, at 18:43 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > On Jan 7, 2013, at 1:48 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 7, 2013, at 03:40 , Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> ISSUE-145: @content override @value >>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/145 >>> >>> PROPOSAL: When both @content and @value appear on the same HTML element, >>> the value of @content MUST be used. >>> >> >> >> +1. > > Note that @value seems to be of extremely dubious value Dubious value (sic!) because the HTML5 definition are unclear or for RDFa? If the former then I think this WG should not take side on that, and leave it as is... Ivan > , and I suggest that we just drop it entirely. I marked it as being at risk. > > If we did keep it, I agree that @content must be used first; same for @datetime. > > Gregg > >> Ivan >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 17:46:19 UTC