- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:05:00 +0000
- To: W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 20 Dec 2011, at 18:02, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/12/20-RDB2RDF-minutes.html > > [[ > RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-72 with no action. Add an example using an R2RML view. > ]] Example added here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#example-translationtable > [[ > RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-57 with: > §1 An R2RML processor is a system that, given an R2RML mapping and an input database, provides access to the output dataset. > §2 An RDF graph that represents an R2RML mapping is called an R2RML mapping graph. > §3 An R2RML mapping document is any document written in the Turtle [TURTLE] RDF syntax that encodes an R2RML mapping graph. > §4 A conforming R2RML processor SHOULD accept R2RML mapping documents in Turtle syntax. It MAY accept R2RML mapping graphs encoded in other RDF syntaxes. > ]] Implemented in the spec – this just required changing MUST to SHOULD in the last sentence. §1 is found here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-r2rml-processor §2 is found here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-r2rml-mapping-graph §3 and §4 are in this subsection: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#syntax Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2011 19:05:41 UTC