Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why orthography attribute?

Issue R103-27

Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 

Resolution: Accept 

We decided to remove the "orthography" attribute. We also do not see its
value and recognize the benefits of supporting a mixture of script types
within a grapheme element. 

Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's resolution,
whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you wish
to register an objection.

Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
From: <ishida@w3.org> 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:50:39 +0000
To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
Message-Id: <20060321175039.2BA234EFDE@homer.w3.org> 


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/

Comment 27
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
4.5

Comment: 
What is the value of the orthography attribute?


We see no value, and its purpose is not expressed in the text.



Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================