- From: Raj Singh <rsingh@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:03:36 -0400
- To: public-poiwg W3C <public-poiwg@w3.org>
I have suggested adopting OGC's structure for geography representation in the following issues. Can we agree to go with this syntax for points, lines, and polygons and coordinate reference systems? ISSUE-19: How should we represent points? http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/issues/19 ISSUE-20: How should we represent lines? http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/issues/20 ISSUE-22: How should we represent polygons? http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/issues/22 ISSUE-21: How should we specify the coordinate system used? http://www.w3.org/2010/POI/track/issues/21 ----- Raj Singh rsingh@opengeospatial.org +1 (617) 642-9372 The OGC: Making location count... http://www.opengeospatial.org/contact
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 15:04:02 UTC