- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:06:36 -0400
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Or perhaps "wasRevisedFrom" to suit the was* naming convention. -Tim On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:00 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-396: Rename "wasRevisionOf" to "revisedFrom"? [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/396 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: prov-dm > > DM editors, > > Could wasRevisionOf be renamed to "revisedFrom" ? > > I think it follows the "wasDerivedFrom" naming a little more closely. > > The Involvement "Revision" (and qualfiedRevision) could remain the same. > > I think that this naming is a little more natural. > > (yes, this is phrased in terms of PROV-O, but an issue on DM; probably best product would be mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o...) > > Thanks, > Tim > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 03:07:06 UTC