- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 13:47:05 -0700
- To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Cc: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <F3BF8AF1-1D73-4FBE-B563-A75BC498259C@lbl.gov>
Wasn’t that one more about how we might use a similar document structure, rather than addressing any particular use cases? It fits with the discussion we’ve had now and then about offering levels of compliance, similar to the WCAG A, AA, AAA levels. -Annette -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 510-495-2935 On Apr 8, 2015, at 12:11 PM, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > In terms of 115, if it's going to remain open, can you suggest a concrete way to resolve it? Something like: > review existing use-cases for WCAG reqs (this is what we're doing for quality vocab) > add a new use-case that specifically outlines WCAG req, and/or > add to list of data usage requirements currently not covered by the data usage vocabulary > Cheers, > Deirdre > > > On 08/04/2015 14:45, Eric Stephan wrote: >> I recommend we leave this action open for discussion. I don't believe have any DWBP use cases that reflect WCAG needs. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag . >> >> Can we have an agenda item for the F2F meeting discussing possible data usage requirements currently not covered by the data usage vocabulary? >> >> Also, should there be a best practice from the data publisher perspective? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eric S > > -- > -------------------------------------- > Deirdre Lee, Director > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 20:47:39 UTC