- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:10:48 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi all, In response, I would suggest the following response: To keep things simple, the Working Group voted that alternateOf and specializationOf should be binary relations, for which the qualified pattern does not apply. So, alternateOf and specializationOf are not subrelations of wasInfluencedBy, and therefore do not have an ID and a list of attributes. Change to the text: none. Thoughts, comments? Luc On 09/10/2012 09:50 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-525: Data Model Section 5.5.1 [prov-dm] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/525 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm > > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/LC_Feedback#Data_Model_Section_5.5.1 > > ISSUE-463 > > Through the definition of Influence (figure 8), the relationship "specializationOf" should require an ID and support an optional list of attributes. > > > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 09:11:18 UTC