- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:51:25 +0000
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Recommended by Ivan. I suggest you follow the same approach /ns/prov-o Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 12 Oct 2011, at 14:48, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:40, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/90 >> >> Raised by: Stian Soiland-Reyes >> On product: Formal Model >> >> The OWL at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl uses the namespace http://w3.org/ProvenanceOntology.owl# which sound quote temporary. > > Reading [1] we should probably go for a namespace like: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/10/prov > > We are not following the Pub-rules if we publish a first draft with > unapproved namespaces. > > > I guess we should use http://www.example.com/ for CrimeFile example, > etc (according to RFC 2606) as they are not normative. > > > We will need to tell someone important to get the proper webserver > stuff set up - but I guess before we go to first public draft the > namespace should be sorted for the ontology. > > > PROV-DM says: [2] > > The PROV-DM namespace is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-dm/ (TBC). > > > Any particular reason this is in /ns/ instead of the /2011/-style? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri > [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#prov-dm-namespace > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester >
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 13:52:03 UTC