Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm]

Ok, but how can we enforce it? What does it mean to be "other" in a PROV context?
Do we need validity rules?


Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:06, "Paul Groth" <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:

> Hi Luc,
> 
> Err.. I took the definition of quotation directly from the dictionary :-)
> 
> So you'd have to argue with them.
> 
> cheers
> Paul
> 
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/357
>> 
>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>> On product: prov-dm
>> 
>> 
>> The definition of Quotation [1] is:
>> 
>> A quotation is the repeat of (some or all of) an entity, such as text or image, by someone other than its original author.
>> 
>> Do we really mean that I wouldn't be entitled to quote myself?    If it's the case, what does it mean to be "someone other than the original author"? are alternates OK?
>> 
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#concept-quotation
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
> 

Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 09:43:10 UTC