Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm]

Hi all,

I propose to close this issue pending review, following changes to the
derivation signatures [1].

Luc

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012May/0095.html

On 04/30/2012 11:41 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/368
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> We are having ongoing discussion about responsibility in derivations (see ISSUE-357 and ISSUE-352).
>
> In the spirit of simplification, I would like to suggest that agents should not be mentioned in derivation relations.
>
> Instead of
>   wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,ag,attrs)
> we should write
>   wasRevisionOf(id,e2,e1,attrs)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e2,ag)
>
>
> Instead of
>   wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,ag2,ag1,attrs)
> we should write:
>   wasQuotedFrom(id,e2,e1,attrs)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e1,ag1)
>   and  wasAttributedTo(e2,ag2)
>
>
>
> We are not losing in expressivity, I believe, instead, we decouple components 2 and 3 in the data model.
>
> Furthermore, if we allow optional arguments in derivations,
> wasDerivedFrom(id, e2, e1, a, g2, u1, attrs)
> they should also be allowed in quotation/original source/revision, to
> make these proper subrelations.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>    

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 14:06:06 UTC