Re: PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n]

Dear all,

Find response to issue 535.  Feedback welcome.

Regards,
Luc
>
>
>       ISSUE-535 (Grammar notation)
>
>   * Original
>     email:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Sep/0129.html
>   * Tracker:http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/535
>   * Group Response:
>       o The comment refers to the previous working draft. The
>         expression now reads as (term | term) and not (term | term)*
>   * References:
>       o http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-n-20120503/#grammar-notation
>   * Changes to the document: none
>   * Original author's acknowledgement:
>


On 10/09/12 10:52, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-535: Notation Section 2.2 [prov-n]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/535
>
> Raised by: Paolo Missier
> On product: prov-n
>
> Please verify the definition of "(term|term)*". I believe it should be "matches zero or more occurrences of one of the two terms".
>
>
>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm