- From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:36:32 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Curt, Following discussion in prov-constraints/prov-n, we are going to rename the toplevel bundle a prov document, wheres the bundle (named set of statements) should remain bundle. If we follow the same terminology, old:NamedBundle should become new:Bundle and old:Bundle should become new:Document. BTW Your suggestion would allow arbitrary levels of nesting of bundles, which we don't want. Cheers, Luc On 09/10/2012 05:32 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-549: XML Schema Bundle vs. NamedBundle [XML Serialization] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/549 > > Raised by: Curt Tilmes > On product: XML Serialization > > What is the rationale for distinguishing Bundle vs. NamedBundle in the > current XSD Schema? > > Why not just have an optional prov:id on Bundle and just have one type? > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 10 September 2012 16:37:00 UTC