- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:56:34 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Yes it is, see definition in DM. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 20 Apr 2012, at 14:59, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > What is the resolution of the issue? > That it will not be included? > > -Tim > > On Apr 19, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> Dear all, >> With WD5 about to be released, I now propose to close this issue. >> Regards, >> Luc >> >> On 21/12/11 21:57, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/205 >>> >>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>> On product: prov-dm >>> >>> >>> We may want to assert the time at which an entity is created. The placeholder for such time information is a generation record. But a generation mandates the presence of an activity identifier. But it may not be known. >>> >>> It would be nice if the activity identifier was made optional in the generation record. >>> >>> Does this have implications for the ontology? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 14:57:17 UTC